Pretending that people with autism diagnoses are typical of people with autism is useful when trying to treat the symptoms of autism; but ignoring less symptomatic people results in ineffective studies when trying to figure out causes and effects. I would argue the same standardization that has raised IQ generally actually de-selects for geniuses in many caseswe spend a lot of time getting people to think and act a certain way and behave efficiently etc. They've also got a blog about what they're doing here. Doing some [fundamental] discovery is harder and harder. If that didnt work because the moralizing pearl-clutching normies insisted on creating arbitrary obstacles in my path to financial success, I would definitely see cuddling up to Putin as a good alternative. That seems like a poor methodology; I think it would be better to start with an unbiased sample of the general population and test them for both autism and IQ. This meant that theyd routinely turn them off. If autism is a result of piling up too many high-IQ alleles, then youd expect to see far more of it in the children of scientists, lawyers, engineers, doctors, mathematicians, etc., than in the children of janitors, file clerks, policemen, nurses, etc. For another (Ravens), its a bunch of iterations of the same basic task (a kind of visual puzzle with one piece missing), described here. That should give us more geniuses, but not a shift in the distribution where now we get a Gauss/von Neumann/Newton/Kant/Einstein born in every town. 10 hours ago View Detailed Check-in. (*) to complicate matters, in normal usage, Im autistic, but in many usages I wouldnt be described as having autism. Perhaps this is an obvious point with an obvious answer, but wouldnt female prevalence of diagnosed autism be expected to be markedly lower? Im going to interpret fitting in as being liked.. The damn thing has basically come true! Without the load, the child would have had a high IQ, but with weak fundation (genetic load) no. I feel like unless your definition of normal includes non-highly intelligent this is just so far from true. Additionally, look at the lives of geniuses throughout American history. How much of this could be IQ tests failing to effectively measure g in autistic individuals? Given that many drugs both medical and recreational appear to affect similarly subtle parameters broadly through relatively simple molecules, theres no reason to assume they cant be much more specifically fine-tuned through genetics. a sort of arrangement where if you pick up to four of them you get enhanced intelligence, five or six and you get high-functioning intelligent autism, and seven or more and your brain crashes on boot-up and the autism stops you from functioning. But quickly selected out of the gene pool doesnt help the individual person who got one of them, who tends to end up severely disabled. This fits with my observations of my family (parents, siblings, kids) and other science majors in college. What will really make someone come off as intelligent within that group is going to be something like 99% IQ plus 99% along that other stuff. Their career progress might have stalled due to stress and sleep deprivation. Keep in mind, my sample size is small. This would be a more useful post if it addressed this change in terminology. So you end up with a system where every gene that increases hyperparameter A makes the individual smarter, except that the individual becomes mentally ill if the hyperparameter exceeds a certain threshold. (This sounds harsh, but I want a child at least as normal as I am). But they can only screen for de novo mutations they know about, and it could be that they just missed some. The optimal value is at 10.0 (for example). I am not, but we both initially bonded over (I dont know a way to put this delicately or more exactly) being objectively very smart people that dont perform intelligence very well, albeit different ways. If you have too many, your legs are bizarrely long twigs that you totter around on like a newborn giraffe, and youve just gone to far so you wont be a great runner. If the g factor and IQ gains from the Flynn Effect are negatively correlated, then does that mean that IQ tests are gradually being more and more poorly designed over time? In some sense, all autism has such-and-such characteristics studies are studying the way people like to define autism, and tell us nothing about any underlying disease process. One possible explanation is simply that autistic children born to poor parents/less intelligent parents/disadvantaged minorities are simply more likely to die in infancy/early childhood and thus never be diagnosed as being autistic to begin with. 10.0 is the optimal learning rate, and 9.5 is good, then 10.5 is typically also good. Dammit, I was nodding along until you threw in sports-watching. Get the latest business insights from Dun & Bradstreet. Every autism case is caused by some combination of these three factors, and the more it is caused by normal genes, the more intelligence is likely to be preserved (~100% confidence), 4. Lazy googling yields claims around 80% narrow-sense (additive) heritability for height which is comparable to the total heritability of IQ. Maybe this is a tower collapse event. Its not because simply being small or being large or having a flat face are inherently unhealthy traits; there are other species that are much smaller than Yorkies, much larger than Great Danes, and have flatter faces than Pugs, without suffering any problems as a result. The Tower vs Foundation model seems to treat intelligence as if its an attribute like height or arm length; the modification of some static variable. 80,000 Hours researches different problems and professions to help you figure out how to do as much good as possible. As long as I kept useful inventions flowing out of my lab, I think hed pay me well and insulate me from social criticism. Many such cases with Aspergers (me too), whereas for high functioning autism the deficit is inverted for processing vs visuo-spatial. [3] Its a highly abnormal subset of people. This is why, as a freshman at 125 lbs, I could beat seniors at 160, 171, 189, and 215 lbs on our team, despite all of them crushing me at the bench press. it separates ASD, ADHD, and ID (intellectual disorder). Take any part away, and you lose some intellectual ability. The additive proportion for height is likely higher. As a result, we could have similar imbalances. These deficits are present in early childhood, typically before age three, and lead to clinically significant functional impairment. There are no other cases of autism diagnosed in the immediate family. I think an important possibility to consider is that some or all of the correlation were observing is simply due to bias in the data were using, rather than any actual relationship between high IQ and autism. I get to see what happens to those kids otherwise, they become adults who ace every math exam, but are unable to buy pants. However, once it exceeds a certain threshold, the network starts learning things that dont make any sense, and then when it tries to correct those mistakes it goes too far in the other direction again. I knew a wrestler back in college, really huge and muscular dude. Im not suggesting this accounts for the high/low intelligence as the sample size was small. List 1 Avoids eye contact Doesn't smile Doesn't reach out to be picked up Rejects your efforts to calm, soothe, and connect Doesn't seem to notice or care when you leave them alone Cries inconsolably Doesn't coo or make sounds Interesting. According to the different mechanism theory, they should have more, but by the collapsing tower theory, they should have fewer. >They are being positively selected, ie increasing with every generation, presumably because people with the genes are having more children than people without them. Thus, the question under discussion becomes does every highly intelligent person have some of these autism-linked genes, or are there other paths to high intelligence that do not involve these genes?. Im not sure how normal she is, but an acquaintance through RenFaire is head of some Army Corps of Engineers office in the Bay Area, and shes one of the very few people I consider noticeably more intelligent than me. I am able to emulate being normal very well at work, but horrible in casual settings. If you get the volume knob too close to the feedback point, the sound will start to behave strangely it will ring weirdly in a way its never done before. Slate Star Codex (SSC) was a blog focused on science, medicine (especially within psychiatry ), philosophy, politics, and futurism. Are you sure any of that is a real thing? If thats the case, if the Flynn effect ever slows down or goes into reverse wed be in quite a bit of trouble, and Scandanavia could be the canary in the coalmine for that process. His auditory channel is very slow and only turns on when you say his name or repeat the question. Giftedness makes people more idiosyncratic. My wife is autistic. There are a lot more pathways to leveraging raw intelligence to acquire economic status now than there used to be, but very few that get you all the way to the point that youre fully safe from the tribe (since the tribe is now the nation and is thus also much stronger now). Judith Harris discusses this in one of her books. His processing was below average. Now there is a very strong effect towards their fathers being less intelligent than usual. This can coexist with a loss in the number of people with the highest potential intelligenceif were building sewers and safe water supplies at the same time were convincing our smartest 5% of people to take a vow of celibacy, well get that pattern. Autistic people being diagnosed with intellectual disabilities before theyre able to to talk and not really being undiagnosed when theyve demonstrated higher levels of ability is very much a thing. I mean, doesnt that just mean there are lots of hyper-parameters and you can push one set outside the optimal range without maxing out everything? Some vaguely similar term like high functioning autism would be used. Only 3% of autistic people were found to have IQs above 115, even though 15% of the population should be at this level. The same principle can be applied to genetic traits. It sounds very plausible that the effect of gene variant a and the effect gene variant b alone tweak the machinery in a way that increases its capabilities, but when applied together, they could have a catastrophic collision. I.e. Couldnt this all be the result of several essentailly different things being lumped together under the label autism spectrum? Agreed. Below are two lists taken from an autism checklist and a reactive attachment disorder list. One of our children is an Asperger (labelled as high functioning autistic in the DSM). And yes, I know the survey showed that the average SSC reader had an IQ of 138, but Im extremely skeptical of that finding too. (Which isnt the same as saying its bimodal; the distribution still peaks in the middle, but its wider and flatter.). The physical kinematics of the human body dictate some ideal limb proportions for the 500-meter dash (say), and thats a target your genetic makeup can miss in either direction. The Charman et al study finds a correlation between autism and low IQ, by starting with a sample of autistic people and looking at their IQs. Auditory learning is therefore the only accessible means for learning prior to the bridging of other brain functions. I know it when I see it and all that. From a certain perspective, it merges with normal. This could be constructed as autistic behavior, but I dont buy it. But even adjusting for these factors, the autism low intelligence correlation seems too strong to dismiss. Some people worry about assortative mating in Silicon Valley: highly analytical tech workers marry other highly analytical tech workers. Intelligence and social aptitude dont seem to be positively correlated, at least not very strongly, but theyre definitely not negatively correlated. Because a masculinizing influence on the brain would militate against the development of brain structures telling the autistic person you are actually a girl.. He is the most Civil Servicy person around. They all share the same hunger for mathematics, and if you get to know those who seem normal on the surface, you find out that they have some interesting hobbies as well. They find that even autistic people without de novo mutations have lower-than-average IQ. The tower model looks close to my personal model, which has absolutely no experimental testing besides how the two of us feel about itbut generally I call it the Smore model. In the graph of relatives, are autists typically on the border or inside of high-IQ regions? Most are weird in the sense of having uncommon interests (reading history or science books or studying languages for fun, say), but most seem pretty normal in terms of personality and affect and such. https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/race-class-contribute-disparities-autism-diagnoses/. (Is that still seen as credible? And we know that theres differential infant mortality rates. Currently offering travel medical insurance for nomads, and global health insurance for remote teams. Titrated use of alcohol in pregnancy and general precautions regarding healthy eating during pregnancy. Id cheerfully get in bed with the military-industrial complex -in fact, Id probably be rock-hard the whole time. This would explain low-functioning autism from de novo mutations or obstetric trauma (the foundation is so weak that it fails no matter how short the tower is). (All three were C-section births.) Most of these seem to be related to social ability. Lets say for example that parameter A is the learning rate in the part of the brain that deals with reasoning. These 3 have a near 100% incidence rate among civil service employees that Ive had to interact with. Wow! One big category would be selection bias due to diagnosis bias. An analogy: Imagine you have a sound system with a microphone, speakers, and a mixing board. This is the only study I know that has actually measured autism rates in the general public. * Expect to be recognized as superior even without achievements that warrant it. If we take the Ronemus and Gardner studies seriously, the answer seems to be yes. If missing, intelligence develops a lot less/later/incompletely? Low IQ people are more likely to end up dead or in jail, and are less likely to be in stable nuclear families. (*), Its not hard to measure my IQ, except that it generally falls at the top of the scale where the tests dont make effective distinctions. 1. I also need alternative means to handle a wide variety of learning and perceptual tasks. A lot of people are using social aptitude as a proxy because thats at least something measureable (at least in concept, if not in practice). However, if too many such genes coincide in the same individual, then A exceeds its optimum of 10. According to the most recent findings on the subject, its not many developed countries, its only Scandinavia. Even when adults with autism live outside the family, their families especially their mothers have extensive contact and involvement in their care. He has the making of a superb engineer. Kylounet is drinking a CAMBIER Double Galaxy by Brasserie Cambier at Terroir Alternatif. Being a deadbeat or loser, or being perceived as same, may be a result, not a cause, of the specifically low-functioning types. Now imagine that someone was in that condition but *couldnt* turn it off. Many people she knew, she said, felt duped by psychiatrists, for example, who they felt. ), but the non-additive portion is of roughly comparable size. Someone at the 99.0 percentile for intelligence would probably seem quite mediocre by SSC standards. i.e. But if you pile on enough of the genes that increase IQ by increasing your head circumference, you will get a kid with such a huge head that his neck wont support it and his heart and lungs cant keep his giant brain in oxygenated blood, and hell die as a baby. This makes a very strong auditory learner. Six months later, the child was cured. However being homozygous for this new mutation would lead to a person being red-green colorblind. Why would you doubt it if you dont have the data? Its because we selectively bred dogs to have these traits at a much faster rate than evolution could naturally develop them. autism polygenic risk scores attached to Tinder profiles My personal bet would be that different sorts of mutations associated with autism could be slotted into abstract prior-mapping-affecting categories manifesting through tiny quirks of cellular chemistry, and some degree of interplay between them and those that affect general nervous tissue metabolism and anatomy might also be the case. Epistemic status: wild speculation backed up only by anecdotal evidence and theory. I remember seeing that article 10 years ago and Ive never followed up, so replication not guaranteed. Then why is there a genetic link? Well, much debate here gets into the distinction between people with high functioning autism and Aspergers, due to a muddling at that end of the scale. Second, my 3rd daughters birth was challenging. . I know plenty of highly intelligent people who nonetheless have very poor impulse control particularly when it comes to libidinous desires! As far as I can tell, the explosion in diagnoses is primarily driven not by the very low-functioning (everyone could already tell that non-verbal folks had something wrong with them) but by increased diagnosis of medium-to-high-functioning people. My first thought when hearing that autism intelligence data is that people are much more likely to end up with the autistic label if theyre disabled. Also, it doesnt really look like autistic people are worse at mental rotation. Theres a question if you want to go really far out, outside the modern human range, and you might get unforeseen side effects. I recognised my son was different at about 15 months old. This shows a) there isnt much of a childhood autism epidemic going on, its more likely that previous underdiagnosis occurred. Autism, and Neurodiversity. Maybe this is old news to most people, so I wont belabor that point any more, but what about the link between high IQ and a different immune function? Observing matters in my local school, I think that child psychiatry is best understood as a means of managing problems that arise in childrens socialization to the school environment, and clusters of diagnoses align with a big three of socialization difficulties: weird dont fit in kids are diagnosed as autistic, restless cant sit still or stop acting up kids are diagnosed as ADD, violent/fighting/tantrum kids are diagnosed with oppositional disorders. These numbers should be taken with very many grains of salt. As for genetics, well, my IQ is ~135, and my wifes is right there with me (~125). Being able to observe a large variety of children with autism (due to activities at the charter school), I agree that autism is a very strange catch-all with many different types of children diagnosed. Moments of it? Or the dad may have left or tuned out because he couldnt handle the situation (but could have handled a socially inept kid who wont shut up about WWI airplane models). But African slaves survived. Other interesting question if the Flynn effect is more important than genetics and our mean IQ is 15 points higher than 100 years ago: where are all the geniuses? Two of our three kids had extremely large heads as babies. Also also, Crespi is one of those scientists who constantly has much more interesting theories than anyone else (eg), and this makes me suspicious. It draws on the VPR model of intelligence, where g (general intelligence) is divided into three subtraits, v (verbal intelligence), p (perceptual intelligence), and r (mental rotation ability) despite the very specific names each of these represents ability at broad categories of cognitive tasks. This study of 45,000 Danes finds that genetic risk for autism correlates at about 0.2 with both IQ and educational attainment. Suppose also that these autism spectrum traits are associated with negative outcomes such as mental retardation, social nonfunction, etc. I also have more ability to perceive what processes I am running. It turns out that giftedness can be quite a burden for children and teenagers, as not many of their peers can relate to them and vice versa. too many CAG repeats and the area destabilizes and you get runaway anticipation that wipes out later generations of your family. Slightly differently: Being gifted makes it harder to take certain things seriously. If you're interested in testing yourself and contributing to their project, check out their questions page. I think youre exaggerating unilateralism, Hypoborean. Awareness of it? Highly intelligent people are likely to have different interests, read and talk about different things, than average peopledoes that make them not normal? Social rituals are incredibly important though, humans are social animals. This fear is reinforced by the fact that of my 12 cousins, 1 is severely autistic, another one is autistic, but can function, 2 are diagnosed aspie and another 1 is an edge-case. If you are an expert in X, and the popular understanding of X is X, you will end up having the exact same conversation about X every time.
Yerkes Observatory Executive Director,
Justin Trudeau Approval Rating,
Clearwater Florida News,
Collegedale Farmers Market,
Articles S